Portal de Abanilla
www.portaldeabanilla.com
Needless to say I am very pleased with the Auto Archive of the cause in which I was seen by the imputed Court No. 2 of Cieza.
Nor joy overflowed because after all it was a chronic expected, for which only time and repair was needed and, if incompletely, the damage it did to me, my family and all those people who believe in my honesty and honesty.
I am and I'm cleaner than a whistle.
I said almost two years ago, he was innocent, that had nothing to do with the matter and had nothing to say about the Brugal.
Clearly, it suffices to say that in the Auto, backed by a prosecutor and a judge, or even see my name.
But what is outrageous excess, besides being an act of hypocrisy mixed with cynicism is that now after the storm passed some congratulated for this.
And above all, the PSRM-PSOE and its local group Abanilla, tireless seekers of political gain.
This is because when the news broke in the media in July 2010, regional leaders and local time, which remain the same as the current, closed and barred door and everyone was your betting particular.
Or Murcia or Abanilla were interested in me, much less to offer his law firm.
His absence and selflessness shone clearly.
No related political leader, in his day, took a note of support and confidence, while my honor and honesty were beaten.
Then I understood that from the solitude of the political face of adversity.
My attorney fees, D.
Balbino Perea, whom I express my deepest gratitude, I've paid for myself.
Today I am pleased that my image has been restored and honor, since I am important fact, among those affected, the only active politics as councilor and spokesman IUMA.
Today I also think I have to make these statements because I sail this boat not only I but we are a full crew to enjoy the journey that clear, direct and clean, clear direction.
With respect to published by the Executive Abanilla PSOE grouping, using the situation and mixing the apples with the oranges, that in the last plenary session were "... only group that voted against an amendment that facilitates urban expansion of the landfill ... ", I have to say not so: what he did with his vote his group was opposed to LIC Municipal Abanilla Sierra, an area of ​​the Natura 2000 network affected by a deficiency outstanding relief contained in the Order December 2007 approving the General Plan (PGMO), required by the Directorate General of Environment.
The PSOE acted irresponsibly, against rule, against the division total, maximum restoration and protection of SCI.
Obviously there was only one plenary agenda and was not the landfill decide yes or no landfill, nor had to talk of illegal dumping or burial in neighboring areas.
In this respect the position of IUMA is strong, having made public on numerous occasions, when he came to the case and was timely: maximum punishment for the crime and environmental personación the City Council in court cases where there is evidence of ecological attack.
Do some historical memory.
It certainly was unanimous that the three municipal forces then: PP, PSOE and approved the activity GIMA Abanilla landfill in 1997.
It is possible that some of them believed that it had granted license for the cultivation of roses and jasmine, for example.
Abanilla Independents reject demagogy, opportunism and populism.
The old politics is dying, a new policy is needed, decent, clean, transparent, with debates better than fighting, of input and alternatives.
Everything changes and evolves and if it dies.
Policies must and must reinvent itself, leaving the ambiguity and confusion, reject the opacity and obscurantism.
Never lose reason and pursue knowledge.
How can I stop thinking about the times in which we live.
I want people who can reach masses doubt and never stop screaming.
I feel pride and responsibility as a representative and spokesman for our people and voting.
I will continue to communicate because it is the only way to reach understanding and respect of all for all.
In short.
I do not want tears of crocodiles.
Do not know anyone who wants a Abanilla cleaner and more prosperous than I, like other, more not.
Riquelme M ª Dolores Saurin
Councillor and Spokesperson IUMA
Source: IUMA
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies